Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43821 - 43830 of 58303 for speedy trial.

Charles Chvala v. Danford C. Bubolz
' motion for summary judgment. The trial court concluded that Chvala was not entitled to records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9951 - 2005-03-31

State v. Miya L.A.
have seen, however, the trial court held a dispositional hearing on December 12, 1995. The subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11088 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Victor J. Fischer v. Deborah J. Fischer
was written on February 8, 1996. The four-day court trial concluded on September 27, 1996. Additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12756 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for an extension of C.A.D.’s commitment on December 21, 2018. A jury trial was held on the petition on February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to proceed by failing to raise the issue during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6206 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.’s trial lawyer’s performance was constitutionally deficient. In order to prevail on a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101885 - 2017-09-21

Slough Creek Properties v. Columbia County
that the trial court correctly interpreted the ordinance and we affirm. The parties have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8839 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, contested the TPR petitions and requested a jury trial.4 Amanda’s and Nicole’s cases were consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247831 - 2020-01-30

Beverly Heebsh v. Jenks Home Maintenance
the proposal was signed. According to Heebsh’s testimony at trial, after about a week she told Bert’s brother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7506 - 2005-03-31

Monica and Paul Kaplewski v. CS & DS, Ltd.
their right to a full trial of the issues and permit the trial court to decide the legal issue. Duhame v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2568 - 2005-03-31