Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43881 - 43890 of 58455 for speedy trial.

[PDF] WI APP 63
a statutory criminal penalty enhancer, to his sentence and that his trial counsel performed ineffectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172514 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to proceed by failing to raise the issue during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6200 - 2017-09-19

James G. Kiecker v. Wisconsin Lutheran College
to the decision of the trial court, although we benefit from its analysis. Id. The purpose of will construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4486 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Susan Malone v. Daniel G. Gaengel
part of their policy. II. Although assisted by the trial court's analysis, we review de novo its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13855 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to proceed by failing to raise the issue during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6216 - 2017-09-19

State v. Scott E. Frye
as the breath test results—on grounds that his arrest was illegal. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10832 - 2005-03-31

Leo W. Ziulkowski v. Gregory M. Nierengarten
., and the Patients Compensation Fund. Richard and Cynthia claim the trial court erred in granting Nierengarten’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9240 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and granted Delsart leave to amend. A trial court’s decisions on motions for leave to amend a complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88714 - 2012-10-29

COURT OF APPEALS
. Background ¶2 The following undisputed facts are taken from the witnesses’ testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44486 - 2009-12-09

State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman
(1999-2000),[1] we affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3301 - 2005-03-31