Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43891 - 43900 of 59232 for SMALL CLAIMS.

City of Manitowoc v. Michael L. McKenna
to questions from the assistant city attorney, McKenna claimed that the bump on the head caused him to suffer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2695 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
.[1] Peter T. appeals orders terminating his parental rights to four children. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4565 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
children. He claims the trial court erred in admitting evidence of events which occurred prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Kirk W. Holstein
. Moreover, Holstein claims, this fact, along with the officer’s lack of information about the informant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4957 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Thomas Z. P.
the trial court at the February 14, 2001 hearing, Thomas’s claim of evidentiary error would make sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4425 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wilma Wendt v. United Government Services
. Id. at 230. The Marshall Field store claimed that since it was a mere tenant in the Mayfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7113 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. David G.K.
and this court need not consider an ineffective assistance of counsel claim unless we conclude that a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2777 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jose Trevino
assistance of counsel claim under the Sixth Amendment, we adhere to the two-part analysis established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12630 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey Donald Leiser
-degree sexual assault of a child and an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20285 - 2005-11-22

State v. David William Newbury
. Newbury claims the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion and imposed an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31