Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43891 - 43900 of 58303 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. John W. Page
with a dangerous weapon in violation of WIS. STAT. § 939.63. He contends the evidence at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15814 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Patricia A. P.
in the new § 48.415(2)(c). Before the trial began, Patricia's counsel moved to dismiss the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8978 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was based upon the evidence received at trial and “statutory factors where applicable ….” Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209000 - 2018-02-27

[PDF] NOTICE
. BACKGROUND ¶2 Franklin was convicted of first-degree sexual assault of a child following a one-day trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53663 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman
statute set forth in WIS. STAT. § 946.42 (1999-2000), 1 we affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3301 - 2017-09-19

Leo W. Ziulkowski v. Gregory M. Nierengarten
., and the Patients Compensation Fund. Richard and Cynthia claim the trial court erred in granting Nierengarten’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9240 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of interest in property. Following an advisory jury trial, the circuit court determined that Robert Greve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165873 - 2017-09-21

WI App 147 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2784 Complete Title...
of Transportation motion in limine. It contends that the court erred in prohibiting it from introducing at a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104520 - 2013-12-17

James G. Kiecker v. Wisconsin Lutheran College
to the decision of the trial court, although we benefit from its analysis. Id. The purpose of will construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4486 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeff S. Mohr
),[1] by arguing that the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence the police obtained when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15913 - 2005-03-31