Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 6306 for 128.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 6306 for 128.
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 128. DISCUSSION ¶16 Lang argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because: (1) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53085 - 2010-08-09
. at 128. DISCUSSION ¶16 Lang argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because: (1) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53085 - 2010-08-09
The Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
no deference to the circuit court’s conclusions. See Advance Pipe & Supply Co., Inc. v. DOR, 128 Wis. 2d 431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2226 - 2005-03-31
no deference to the circuit court’s conclusions. See Advance Pipe & Supply Co., Inc. v. DOR, 128 Wis. 2d 431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2226 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court. Id. at 128. The test for prejudice under Strickland is whether there is a “reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213867 - 2018-06-12
of the trial court. Id. at 128. The test for prejudice under Strickland is whether there is a “reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213867 - 2018-06-12
[PDF]
County of Ozaukee v. Nancy L. Quelle
assessed was no greater or lesser than usual. Cf. State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8935 - 2017-09-19
assessed was no greater or lesser than usual. Cf. State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8935 - 2017-09-19
State v. Marques D. Miller
questions of law. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Finally, we need not address both Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2005-03-31
questions of law. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Finally, we need not address both Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
.’” State v. Nordness, 128 Wis. 2d 15, 35, 381 N.W.2d 300 (1986) (citations omitted). In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754920 - 2024-01-25
.’” State v. Nordness, 128 Wis. 2d 15, 35, 381 N.W.2d 300 (1986) (citations omitted). In the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754920 - 2024-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdict. See State v. Wilson, 180 Wis. 2d 414, 424, 509 N.W.2d 128 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109288 - 2017-09-21
favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdict. See State v. Wilson, 180 Wis. 2d 414, 424, 509 N.W.2d 128 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109288 - 2017-09-21
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. David H. Schwarz
. Horton, 128 Wis. 2d 404, 418, 383 N.W.2d 54 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 918, overruled on other
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17475 - 2005-03-31
. Horton, 128 Wis. 2d 404, 418, 383 N.W.2d 54 (1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 918, overruled on other
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17475 - 2005-03-31
Delco Electronics Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
); NCR Corp. v. DOR, 128 Wis.2d 442, 447-48, 384 N.W.2d 355, 358-59 (Ct. App. 1986), the TAC has never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14151 - 2005-03-31
); NCR Corp. v. DOR, 128 Wis.2d 442, 447-48, 384 N.W.2d 355, 358-59 (Ct. App. 1986), the TAC has never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14151 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 76
, 134 Wis. 2d 336, 345, 397 N.W.2d 128 (Ct. App. 1986), indicates that the concern in Wallen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114877 - 2017-09-21
, 134 Wis. 2d 336, 345, 397 N.W.2d 128 (Ct. App. 1986), indicates that the concern in Wallen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114877 - 2017-09-21