Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 68502 for did.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how additional investigation would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5766 - 2017-09-19
that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how additional investigation would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5766 - 2017-09-19
Town Board of Montrose v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin
construction did not begin within one year of initial approval of the CUP. The Board of Adjustment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5763 - 2005-03-31
construction did not begin within one year of initial approval of the CUP. The Board of Adjustment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5763 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
considered that while Quinonez did not use cocaine, he distributed cocaine to earn income. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83503 - 2014-09-15
considered that while Quinonez did not use cocaine, he distributed cocaine to earn income. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
constitutional right to counsel was violated because he or she did not knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99511 - 2014-09-15
constitutional right to counsel was violated because he or she did not knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99511 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
properly dismissed the petition. We conclude that it did. Therefore, we affirm. No. 2011AP2069
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87252 - 2014-09-15
properly dismissed the petition. We conclude that it did. Therefore, we affirm. No. 2011AP2069
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87252 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth Neu
and the officer: Q. Did you ask the defendant or did the defendant indicate to you whether or not he had any eye
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16044 - 2005-03-31
and the officer: Q. Did you ask the defendant or did the defendant indicate to you whether or not he had any eye
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16044 - 2005-03-31
Bruce W. Bader v. Westfield Insurance Company
., No. 96-2643, slip op. at 5 (Wis. Ct. App. May 13, 1997). We did not expressly address Bruce’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13715 - 2005-03-31
., No. 96-2643, slip op. at 5 (Wis. Ct. App. May 13, 1997). We did not expressly address Bruce’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13715 - 2005-03-31
State v. John N. McCoy
plea makes a prima facie showing that the trial court's plea colloquy did not comply with § 971.08(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8945 - 2005-03-31
plea makes a prima facie showing that the trial court's plea colloquy did not comply with § 971.08(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8945 - 2005-03-31
State v. John N. Mccoy
plea makes a prima facie showing that the trial court's plea colloquy did not comply with § 971.08(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8946 - 2005-03-31
plea makes a prima facie showing that the trial court's plea colloquy did not comply with § 971.08(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8946 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chris M. Holland
that the officer did not offer him an alternative test when requested, and Holland so testified at a pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17948 - 2017-09-21
that the officer did not offer him an alternative test when requested, and Holland so testified at a pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17948 - 2017-09-21