Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43901 - 43910 of 45827 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 43901 - 43910 of 45827 for paternity test paper work.
Steven Burnett v. Claude Hill
that compliance with the statute, and not "substantial compliance," is the proper test. American Family at 534
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16930 - 2015-01-25
that compliance with the statute, and not "substantial compliance," is the proper test. American Family at 534
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16930 - 2015-01-25
Michael Malmstadt v. State
process necessitates appointment of counsel. Id. at 26, 32. The Lassiter Court devised a test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17064 - 2005-03-31
process necessitates appointment of counsel. Id. at 26, 32. The Lassiter Court devised a test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17064 - 2005-03-31
Joni B. v. State
process necessitates appointment of counsel. Id. at 26, 32. The Lassiter Court devised a test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17063 - 2005-03-31
process necessitates appointment of counsel. Id. at 26, 32. The Lassiter Court devised a test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17063 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 841 (Ct. App. 1996) (adopting federal test from Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132733 - 2015-01-07
.2d 841 (Ct. App. 1996) (adopting federal test from Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132733 - 2015-01-07
COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. Stated differently, the prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117807 - 2014-07-23
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. Stated differently, the prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117807 - 2014-07-23
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
if the Sullivan tests are met, the evidence should still have been excluded because of the State’s lack of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13075 - 2017-09-21
if the Sullivan tests are met, the evidence should still have been excluded because of the State’s lack of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13075 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 189
reversal). Discretionary determinations are not tested on appeal by our sense of what might be a “right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26321 - 2006-09-26
reversal). Discretionary determinations are not tested on appeal by our sense of what might be a “right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26321 - 2006-09-26
CA Blank Order
-prong test. See State v. Marinez, 2011 WI 12, ¶19, 331 Wis. 2d 568, 585, 797 N.W.2d 399, 410. Other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120833 - 2014-08-28
-prong test. See State v. Marinez, 2011 WI 12, ¶19, 331 Wis. 2d 568, 585, 797 N.W.2d 399, 410. Other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120833 - 2014-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158871 - 2017-09-21
need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158871 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
the deficient performance or prejudicial component of the test, the other component is not addressed. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
the deficient performance or prejudicial component of the test, the other component is not addressed. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31