Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43911 - 43920 of 58303 for speedy trial.
Search results 43911 - 43920 of 58303 for speedy trial.
William J. Vonderhaar v. Soo Line Railroad Company
.[2] Soo Line moved for summary judgment, the trial court granted the motion, and Vonderhaar appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2221 - 2005-03-31
.[2] Soo Line moved for summary judgment, the trial court granted the motion, and Vonderhaar appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2221 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] Daniel Odegard appeals the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, for operating while under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35733 - 2009-03-04
] Daniel Odegard appeals the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, for operating while under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35733 - 2009-03-04
[PDF]
William J. Vonderhaar v. Soo Line Railroad Company
, the trial court granted the motion, and Vonderhaar appeals. II. Analysis ¶3 Vonderhaar argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2221 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court granted the motion, and Vonderhaar appeals. II. Analysis ¶3 Vonderhaar argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2221 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A.T.
an offer of proof that his trial attorney was prepared to testify that the district attorney told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4635 - 2017-09-19
an offer of proof that his trial attorney was prepared to testify that the district attorney told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4635 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶9 At trial, it was Z.T.R.’s contention that it was for the jury to decide whether he had “reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239778 - 2019-05-01
. ¶9 At trial, it was Z.T.R.’s contention that it was for the jury to decide whether he had “reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239778 - 2019-05-01
[PDF]
Charles Chvala v. Danford C. Bubolz
judgment. The trial court concluded that Chvala was not entitled to records of the Patients Compensation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9951 - 2017-09-19
judgment. The trial court concluded that Chvala was not entitled to records of the Patients Compensation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9951 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Miya L.A.
in the case on December 15, 1995.3 As we have seen, however, the trial court held a dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11088 - 2017-09-19
in the case on December 15, 1995.3 As we have seen, however, the trial court held a dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11088 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
trial in December of 2005. Torres’s accountant was the only witness to testify. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30147 - 2014-09-15
trial in December of 2005. Torres’s accountant was the only witness to testify. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30147 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to proceed by failing to raise the issue during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6206 - 2017-09-19
to proceed by failing to raise the issue during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6206 - 2017-09-19
Beverly Heebsh v. Jenks Home Maintenance
the proposal was signed. According to Heebsh’s testimony at trial, after about a week she told Bert’s brother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7506 - 2005-03-31
the proposal was signed. According to Heebsh’s testimony at trial, after about a week she told Bert’s brother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7506 - 2005-03-31