Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 441 - 450 of 30175 for de.

[PDF] NOTICE
on the merits or a de novo trial. ¶4 The circuit court filed its decision on April 17. It rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31212 - 2014-09-15

City of Delavan v. Roger Sterken
entering his home. Second, Sterken contends that the City of Delavan is not entitled to a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20368 - 2005-11-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). We review the circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193100 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] P
- 20 10 R ev er se d an d re m an de d 20 08 A P 00 22 52 C R S ta te v . C od
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49145 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Approval Date: 11/21/2019 Page 1
of Form: Motion for De Novo Review on a Temporary Restraining Order or Injunction Form Number: CV
/formdisplay/CV-503_summary.pdf?formNumber=CV-503&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-02-27

Date: December 5, 2008 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 1 Opinions for Release On Dece...
Milwaukee 2008AP000880 CR State v. Robert L. Artic, Sr. Milwaukee 2008AP001127 CR State v. De-Yul Thames
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34848 - 2008-12-07

Town of Madison v. Randall E. Gartland
. ¶3 Gartland requested a trial de novo in Dane County Circuit Court. He received a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3530 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Clemens V. Hedeen, Jr. v. County of Door
it uses to review the RPC's decisions from deferential to de novo seven days before it was scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9341 - 2017-09-19

Clemens V. Hedeen, Jr. v. County of Door
the standard it uses to review the RPC's decisions from deferential to de novo seven days before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9341 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a de novo circuit court hearing. As a result of the hearing, the circuit court made the following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345928 - 2021-03-17