Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 441 - 450 of 68969 for had.
Search results 441 - 450 of 68969 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Argyle L. Hagen
for the arrest. Because we conclude that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Hagen for OMVWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16297 - 2017-09-21
for the arrest. Because we conclude that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Hagen for OMVWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16297 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
that the victim’s biological material had never been in the custody of the government and that the biological
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137519 - 2015-03-11
that the victim’s biological material had never been in the custody of the government and that the biological
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137519 - 2015-03-11
2006 WI 115
notification that its computer system had to be shut down for maintenance purposes. When Attorney Beatse's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26722 - 2006-10-10
notification that its computer system had to be shut down for maintenance purposes. When Attorney Beatse's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26722 - 2006-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. However, after Mary testified, Rhodes notified the bailiff that she had recognized Mary when Mary walked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244338 - 2019-07-30
. However, after Mary testified, Rhodes notified the bailiff that she had recognized Mary when Mary walked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244338 - 2019-07-30
State v. Argyle L. Hagen
not have probable cause for the arrest. Because we conclude that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31
not have probable cause for the arrest. Because we conclude that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
not have probable cause to believe that Mills had operated a motor vehicle. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42813 - 2014-09-15
not have probable cause to believe that Mills had operated a motor vehicle. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42813 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 115
of his office, the district attorney's office received notification that its computer system had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26722 - 2014-09-15
of his office, the district attorney's office received notification that its computer system had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26722 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
an automobile insurance policy to Ehmann. Allied’s policy had an exclusion for any person “using a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
an automobile insurance policy to Ehmann. Allied’s policy had an exclusion for any person “using a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress, reasoning that neither dispatch nor the arresting officer had reason to suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109824 - 2017-09-21
motion to suppress, reasoning that neither dispatch nor the arresting officer had reason to suspect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109824 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ozaukee County v. Nancy K. Mutsch
. She contends that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to believe that she had operated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12012 - 2017-09-21
. She contends that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to believe that she had operated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12012 - 2017-09-21