Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 441 - 450 of 1040 for oak.

[PDF] State v. Carroll D. Watkins
. No. 00-0064-CR(D) 3 power plant in Oak Creek. They had known each other and worked together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2122 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David G. Alexander
, judge, presiding. The arresting officer, Officer Gallagher of the Oak Creek Police Department
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17134 - 2017-09-21

State v. Carroll D. Watkins
plant in Oak Creek. They had known each other and worked together for about one and one-half years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2122 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] MuniView Newsletter April 2005
JUDGES District 1: Alice Rudebusch was appointed in the City of Oak Creek on June 28, 2004
/courts/municipal/muniview/april05.pdf - 2009-11-16

[PDF] Uniform Proposed Maps - 2 of 2 (Lisa Hunter et al.)
- C HalesCorners - V Milwaukee - C Oak Creek - C RiverHills - V St.Francis- C Shorewood - V
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/uniformpropmapshunter2.pdf - 2022-01-18

[PDF] Disposition table for November & December 2008
State v. Bernard 12/15/2008 2007AP2761-CRNM State v. Williams 11/17/2008 2007AP2855 City of Oak
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35224 - 2014-09-15

Warren D. Patek v. Peggy A. Stearns
– specifically, Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co., 44 Wis.2d 45, 170 N.W.2d 813 (1969), Hayne v. Progressive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12122 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] _WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
Dismissed 4 2024AP000658 Thousand Oaks MHC LLC v. James Canfield 08-14-2025 Reversed and remanded
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023008 - 2025-10-09

[PDF] Warren D. Patek v. Peggy A. Stearns
– specifically, Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co., 44 Wis.2d 45, 170 N.W.2d 813 (1969), Hayne v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12122 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Public Safety and Justice Committee of the Rock County Board of Supervisors v.
and conclusive” decisions that are not subject to appeal. See Younglove v. Oak Creek Fire & Police Comm’n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12577 - 2017-09-21