Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 40298 for Antique πŸ’₯🏹 antiquewolrd.com πŸ’₯🏹 antique news πŸ’₯🏹 clean antique πŸ’₯🏹 antique brass πŸ’₯🏹 antiqueworld.

State v. Roger P. Barber
a year to pursue a new trial following remand from this court, that a substitute witness should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4992 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for discharge must set forth new evidence, not considered by a prior trier of fact, from which a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129031 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Lisimba Liteef Love appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64048 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
After his conviction Hildebrand moved for modified sentences, alleging new factors. At a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34379 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, arguing that the existence of new factors justified sentence modification. Gollier complained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454132 - 2021-11-23

COURT OF APPEALS
Hildebrand moved for modified sentences, alleging new factors. At a hearing on his motion he presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34379 - 2008-10-22

[PDF] State v. James R. Arbuckle
the test. We affirm. ΒΆ2 Arbuckle, a New Mexico resident, was driving a motorcycle when he was stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4795 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
” principle at sentencing.[1] Additionally, he maintains that a new factor justified the modification of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73368 - 2011-11-08

COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence. Because we conclude that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64048 - 2011-05-16

COURT OF APPEALS
a motion for postconviction relief seeking a new trial on the grounds that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93595 - 2013-03-05