Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 17267 for Search wicourts.gov.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 17267 for Search wicourts.gov.
[PDF]
WI APP 15
searched his vehicle after arresting him for possession of marijuana, and that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
searched his vehicle after arresting him for possession of marijuana, and that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lance R. Ward
during the search of Ward’s home should have been suppressed because the affidavit submitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17286 - 2005-03-31
during the search of Ward’s home should have been suppressed because the affidavit submitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17286 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN
residence was a Fourth Amendment violation, should the evidence found from the execution of a search
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/scull.pdf - 2014-09-23
residence was a Fourth Amendment violation, should the evidence found from the execution of a search
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/scull.pdf - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Jones
that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search was illegal. We agree that the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21
that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search was illegal. We agree that the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert F. Jones
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
State v. Stanley Soward
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Soward
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth W. Grothmann
not have probable cause to arrest him, (2) the warrantless search of his vehicle was not consensual, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19378 - 2005-08-23
not have probable cause to arrest him, (2) the warrantless search of his vehicle was not consensual, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19378 - 2005-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
the search of his friend’s apartment and basement, the police did not have exigent circumstances to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133593 - 2015-01-26
the search of his friend’s apartment and basement, the police did not have exigent circumstances to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133593 - 2015-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suppression motion. He asserts that: he had standing to challenge the search of his friend’s apartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133593 - 2017-09-21
suppression motion. He asserts that: he had standing to challenge the search of his friend’s apartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133593 - 2017-09-21