Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 82596 for case codes/1000.

Tony Shaw v. Gary R. McCaughtry
court violated his constitutional rights by citing Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 308.04(5), which did not become
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14091 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tony Shaw v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. ADM. CODE § DOC 308.04(5), which did not become effective until after Shaw’s hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14091 - 2014-09-15

Michael P. Murphy v. Daniel R. Bertrand
. See Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.67.[1] Wisconsin Adm. Code § DOC 303.67 requires the security director
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13874 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Thomas Ponchik v. Jeffrey Endicott
Thomas Ponchik guilty of disruptive behavior, contrary to WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 303.28. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14228 - 2014-09-15

Julie M. Lassa v. Todd Rongstad
2006 WI 105 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP377 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25913 - 2006-07-12

[PDF] Julie M. Lassa v. Todd Rongstad
2006 WI 105 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP377 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25913 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wood County Department of Human Services v. Joseph A. R.
. § 48.315, under the undisputed facts of this case, presents a legal question of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4796 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Wood County Department of Human Services v. Joseph A. R.
. § 48.315, under the undisputed facts of this case, presents a legal question of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4798 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
, under the undisputed facts of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4816 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wood County Department of Human Services v. Joseph A. R.
. § 48.315, under the undisputed facts of this case, presents a legal question of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4797 - 2017-09-20