Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132775 - 2015-01-13
de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132775 - 2015-01-13
State v. De'Andrus N.
that we apply Wis. Stat. §§ 948.02(1) and 948.01(5)(a). Our review is de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6616 - 2005-03-31
that we apply Wis. Stat. §§ 948.02(1) and 948.01(5)(a). Our review is de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6616 - 2005-03-31
Shirell Watkins, Sr. v. Gerald A. Berge
for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Deininger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Deininger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion is procedurally barred is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125302 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion is procedurally barred is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125302 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patricia Marshall Scales v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
¶4 We review the validity of a statutory settlement offer de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16125 - 2017-09-21
¶4 We review the validity of a statutory settlement offer de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16125 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dorothy Coello v. Allstate Insurance Company
affirm the judgment. We review summary judgments de novo and will affirm if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12712 - 2017-09-21
affirm the judgment. We review summary judgments de novo and will affirm if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12712 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven R. Plevak
the search was lawful, presents an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15494 - 2005-03-31
the search was lawful, presents an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intent are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338259 - 2021-02-24
intent are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338259 - 2021-02-24
Horst W. Josellis v. Pace Industries, Inc.
if not clearly erroneous, and the conclusion of frivolousness reviewed de novo as a question of law. See Riley v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5274 - 2005-03-31
if not clearly erroneous, and the conclusion of frivolousness reviewed de novo as a question of law. See Riley v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5274 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chad L. Edwards
at trial supports a lesser-included offense is a question of law which we review de novo. See Kramar, 149
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12113 - 2005-03-31
at trial supports a lesser-included offense is a question of law which we review de novo. See Kramar, 149
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12113 - 2005-03-31