Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 68274 for did.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
from the case when Guibord indicated he did not want to be represented by counsel. 2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14230 - 2014-09-15
from the case when Guibord indicated he did not want to be represented by counsel. 2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14230 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry N. Henkel
signifies that the court did find that the Dodge County conviction was a new factor. If there was no new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12465 - 2005-03-31
signifies that the court did find that the Dodge County conviction was a new factor. If there was no new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12465 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of initial confinement and fourteen years of extended supervision. Harris did not file a direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28100 - 2014-09-15
of initial confinement and fourteen years of extended supervision. Harris did not file a direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28100 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David W. Barrow v. Wayne Watry
and paint them. Also, the Watrys threatened legal action if Barrow and DuCharme did not pay them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13025 - 2017-09-21
and paint them. Also, the Watrys threatened legal action if Barrow and DuCharme did not pay them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13025 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68324 - 2011-07-20
is entitled to a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68324 - 2011-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish that he was entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68324 - 2014-09-15
of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish that he was entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68324 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts four new cases
Issue presented: Did the court of appeals apply the proper legal standard to its review of the circuit
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac010523.pdf - 2023-01-05
Issue presented: Did the court of appeals apply the proper legal standard to its review of the circuit
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac010523.pdf - 2023-01-05
[PDF]
WI 4
Protasiewicz, J. did not participate. 09/26/2023 2021AP1102-CRNM State v. Justin Dennis Krizan 09/26
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754433 - 2024-01-19
Protasiewicz, J. did not participate. 09/26/2023 2021AP1102-CRNM State v. Justin Dennis Krizan 09/26
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754433 - 2024-01-19
[PDF]
Disposition table - September 2023
Protasiewicz, J. did not participate. 09/26/2023 2021AP1102-CRNM State v. Justin Dennis Krizan 09/26
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754433 - 2024-01-19
Protasiewicz, J. did not participate. 09/26/2023 2021AP1102-CRNM State v. Justin Dennis Krizan 09/26
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754433 - 2024-01-19
[PDF]
State v. Leonard E. Wille
did not observe any keys in the ignition or any likely containers of alcoholic beverages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14606 - 2017-09-21
did not observe any keys in the ignition or any likely containers of alcoholic beverages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14606 - 2017-09-21