Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 65747 for divorce records/1000.

Carl I. Nelson, Jr. v. Charlotte A. Nelson
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Charlotte Nelson appeals from a judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2586 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
that portion of a judgment of divorce that divided marital property. Jerry argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60268 - 2014-09-15

Stacy L. Giraud v. Todd R. Giraud
proceedings. In the July 21, 1997 judgment of divorce, the trial court set monthly maintenance at $500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14318 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
represented A.W. in her divorce from E.W. He also represented A.W. in obtaining a domestic abuse restraining
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/quiroga.pdf - 2024-04-12

Gregory J. Kasubaski v. Maureen Desmond Kasubaski
. PER CURIAM. Gregory J. Kasubaski appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for a divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8760 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Deborah A. Schumaker v. Howard D. Schumaker
. Howard Schumaker appeals from a judgment divorcing him from Deborah Schumaker. The issues are whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16127 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Gregory J. Kasubaski v. Maureen Desmond Kasubaski
J. Kasubaski appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for a divorce for lack of personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8760 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Terry K. Voice v. Mary Ellen Johnson
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Terry Voice appeals the judgment divorcing him from Mary Ellen Johnson. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2876 - 2017-09-19

Deborah A. Schumaker v. Howard D. Schumaker
a judgment divorcing him from Deborah Schumaker. The issues are whether the trial court properly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16127 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey L. Leggions
. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the trial court’s findings are not clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31