Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 69052 for he.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 69052 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
that he is entitled to resentencing or sentence modification because his trial counsel provided deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129360 - 2014-11-24
that he is entitled to resentencing or sentence modification because his trial counsel provided deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129360 - 2014-11-24
2010 WI APP 15
of his employment with the City. He asserts that the circuit court incorrectly concluded that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44525 - 2010-01-26
of his employment with the City. He asserts that the circuit court incorrectly concluded that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44525 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the State after being given a favorable plea deal and testimonial immunity. LaBrec testified he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348264 - 2021-03-23
for the State after being given a favorable plea deal and testimonial immunity. LaBrec testified he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348264 - 2021-03-23
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Coltrane
2004AP2302 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. ยงยง 943.32(2), 939.05, 939.63, and 939.641(2) (2001-02). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19167 - 2017-09-21
2004AP2302 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. ยงยง 943.32(2), 939.05, 939.63, and 939.641(2) (2001-02). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19167 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard P. Gilliland
] On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25917 - 2006-08-29
] On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25917 - 2006-08-29
State v. William P. Haessly
)(a), 939.05 and 939.63 (1991-92).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6139 - 2005-03-31
)(a), 939.05 and 939.63 (1991-92).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6139 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dean Garfoot
competency evaluators, described the incident on the basis of police reports he reviewed as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7956 - 2005-03-31
competency evaluators, described the incident on the basis of police reports he reviewed as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7956 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dean Garfoot
competency evaluators, described the incident on the basis of police reports he reviewed as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7956 - 2017-09-19
competency evaluators, described the incident on the basis of police reports he reviewed as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7956 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he received ineffective assistance from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34417 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he received ineffective assistance from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34417 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael J. Moran
. On appeal, Moran argues that he did not refuse the test because his diabetic condition rendered him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12619 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal, Moran argues that he did not refuse the test because his diabetic condition rendered him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12619 - 2005-03-31