Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44061 - 44070 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.

Richard D. Winters, Jr. v. Marianne Cooke
, 469 N.W.2d 611 (1991). Winters' claim that he was not given a copy of the notice or adequate notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9822 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The respondents, ADS Waste Holdings and Arch Insurance Company, disputed the claims. The case was heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479444 - 2022-02-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that there is no arguably meritorious basis to claim that the court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916439 - 2025-02-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine entered on her no contest plea. She claims the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970388 - 2025-06-18

State v. Tecia D.B.
of Milwaukee Child Welfare. Although trial evidence supported Tecia’s claim that she had experienced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6837 - 2005-03-31

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Herbert L. Usow
to determine the actual time spent. The arbitrators specifically did not find that the hours claimed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17183 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. Helen had DeHart sign a quit claim deed disclaiming his interest in the house. Helen then called law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958308 - 2025-05-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the real controversy was not fully tried. We reject Schmidt’s claim and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89022 - 2012-11-06

Roberta Youso v. City of Neenah Board of Review
. On appeal, Youso claims that the City of Neenah Board of Review (the Board) exceeded its jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9043 - 2005-03-31

09AP308 County of Walworth v. Lauderdale Lakes Management District.doc
is the functional equivalent of the exclusion of evidence and, under Wis. Stat. § 901.03(1)(b), claimed error cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42763 - 2009-11-03