Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44061 - 44070 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 44061 - 44070 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1153-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596844 - 2022-12-06
. No. 2021AP1153-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596844 - 2022-12-06
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
Patrick T. Sheedy for Judge Raymond E. Gieringer.” The record on appeal[1] does not disclose the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12370 - 2005-03-31
Patrick T. Sheedy for Judge Raymond E. Gieringer.” The record on appeal[1] does not disclose the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason W. Johnson
not responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12877 - 2017-09-21
not responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12877 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis L. Farr
in this case, he has not cited any proof of record to substantiate his charge. This appeal does not concern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
in this case, he has not cited any proof of record to substantiate his charge. This appeal does not concern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11495 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason A. Krysheski
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11918 - 2005-03-31
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11918 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928582 - 2025-03-19
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928582 - 2025-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101801 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101801 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489543 - 2022-03-02
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489543 - 2022-03-02
[PDF]
Douglas J. Richer v. Donald Gudmanson
affirming a prison disciplinary decision. We conclude that the record does not support the finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12978 - 2017-09-21
affirming a prison disciplinary decision. We conclude that the record does not support the finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Michael V. Hendricks
, we examine the record to determine whether the circuit court logically interpreted the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2178 - 2017-09-19
, we examine the record to determine whether the circuit court logically interpreted the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2178 - 2017-09-19