Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44071 - 44080 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 44071 - 44080 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316784 - 2020-12-23
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316784 - 2020-12-23
State v. Rodney R. Clark
2000 WI App 245 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 245 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry D. Hicks
of this case, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 On November 9, 2003, Hicks pried open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06
of this case, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 On November 9, 2003, Hicks pried open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to file his notice of appeal “with the opposing party, in this case the City of West Allis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104154 - 2013-11-12
to file his notice of appeal “with the opposing party, in this case the City of West Allis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104154 - 2013-11-12
Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota
dismissing the case, but preserved certain limited powers over the settlement pursuant to the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9239 - 2005-03-31
dismissing the case, but preserved certain limited powers over the settlement pursuant to the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9239 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas T. Meyer
the cases from two counties; (2) the repeater allegations were not properly pled or proved and Meyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3810 - 2005-03-31
the cases from two counties; (2) the repeater allegations were not properly pled or proved and Meyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3810 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in a second case. The two cases were joined for trial over Wilder’s objection. Before trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244527 - 2019-07-30
in a second case. The two cases were joined for trial over Wilder’s objection. Before trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244527 - 2019-07-30
Omowale Nubian Black v. Eleanor Swoboda
to the trial court's placement of this case on its dismissal calendar.[6] He claimed that he would move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9726 - 2005-03-31
to the trial court's placement of this case on its dismissal calendar.[6] He claimed that he would move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9726 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark S. Witkowski
, immobilization and other provisions of the statutes. This case presents an undisputed set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
, immobilization and other provisions of the statutes. This case presents an undisputed set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
Adalbert Menzer v. Theron A. Nair
and the coverage question in this case. Applying Michigan law, we conclude that State Farm does not owe coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9160 - 2005-03-31
and the coverage question in this case. Applying Michigan law, we conclude that State Farm does not owe coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9160 - 2005-03-31