Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4411 - 4420 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 4411 - 4420 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the second question need not be considered.” Bar Code Res., 229 Wis. 2d at 292. ¶11 Two cases illustrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596925 - 2022-12-06
, the second question need not be considered.” Bar Code Res., 229 Wis. 2d at 292. ¶11 Two cases illustrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596925 - 2022-12-06
Muriel K. v. Milwaukee County
This is the third time this case has come to us, and its history has been recounted in three published opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7488 - 2005-03-31
This is the third time this case has come to us, and its history has been recounted in three published opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7488 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Muriel K. v. Milwaukee County
this case has come to us, and its history has been recounted in three published opinions: Knight v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7488 - 2017-09-20
this case has come to us, and its history has been recounted in three published opinions: Knight v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7488 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Allen Pautsch v. Phillip Kingston
the “[l]oss of a specific privilege.” WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.84(1)(e). The rules provide that “[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5524 - 2017-09-19
the “[l]oss of a specific privilege.” WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.84(1)(e). The rules provide that “[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5524 - 2017-09-19
Allen Pautsch v. Phillip Kingston
the “[l]oss of a specific privilege.” Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.84(1)(e). The rules provide that “[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
the “[l]oss of a specific privilege.” Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.84(1)(e). The rules provide that “[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Hector Cubero v. Dan Buchler
is its finding that Cubero violated WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 303.511, being in an unassigned area. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8239 - 2017-09-19
is its finding that Cubero violated WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 303.511, being in an unassigned area. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8239 - 2017-09-19
Hector Cubero v. Dan Buchler
Institution (RCI). At issue is its finding that Cubero violated Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.511, being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-03-31
Institution (RCI). At issue is its finding that Cubero violated Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.511, being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
policies. Upon review, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from the death of Lorenzo on July 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967321 - 2025-06-10
policies. Upon review, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from the death of Lorenzo on July 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967321 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
State v. Joshua J.B.
for the juvenile. A court report dated November 30, 1999, was filed by Case Manager Lana Morgan, Racine County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3144 - 2017-09-19
for the juvenile. A court report dated November 30, 1999, was filed by Case Manager Lana Morgan, Racine County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3144 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jorge T.
that night. The decision whether to waive juvenile jurisdiction in a given case is one which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14190 - 2014-09-15
that night. The decision whether to waive juvenile jurisdiction in a given case is one which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14190 - 2014-09-15