Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4411 - 4420 of 63629 for records/1000.
Search results 4411 - 4420 of 63629 for records/1000.
[PDF]
Kathleen S. Vitalis v. Daniel J. Vitalis
- arguing that the trial court erroneously ordered an unequal property division. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11302 - 2017-09-19
- arguing that the trial court erroneously ordered an unequal property division. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11302 - 2017-09-19
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
of $100,000 annual income is reasonable and supported by the evidence of record, and that Mott was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10953 - 2005-03-31
of $100,000 annual income is reasonable and supported by the evidence of record, and that Mott was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10953 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
by the evidence of record, and that Mott was entitled to attorney fees for expenses incurred based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10464 - 2017-09-20
by the evidence of record, and that Mott was entitled to attorney fees for expenses incurred based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10464 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
[PDF]
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
by the evidence of record, and that Mott was entitled to attorney fees for expenses incurred based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10953 - 2017-09-19
by the evidence of record, and that Mott was entitled to attorney fees for expenses incurred based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10953 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578571 - 2022-10-18
claims. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578571 - 2022-10-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the record before this court. Additional facts are provided below as necessary. DISCUSSION ΒΆ6 The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27591 - 2014-09-15
in the record before this court. Additional facts are provided below as necessary. DISCUSSION ΒΆ6 The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27591 - 2014-09-15
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
of $100,000 annual income is reasonable and supported by the evidence of record, and that Mott was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10464 - 2005-03-31
of $100,000 annual income is reasonable and supported by the evidence of record, and that Mott was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10464 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert F. Nagel v. State
stated on the record that she intended to call Freddie Brown as a witness for the prosecution. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7833 - 2017-09-19
stated on the record that she intended to call Freddie Brown as a witness for the prosecution. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7833 - 2017-09-19
Robert F. Nagel v. State
the prosecutor stated on the record that she intended to call Freddie Brown as a witness for the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7833 - 2005-03-31
the prosecutor stated on the record that she intended to call Freddie Brown as a witness for the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7833 - 2005-03-31