Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4411 - 4420 of 20373 for sai.
Search results 4411 - 4420 of 20373 for sai.
State v. James R. Walz
and approached the patrol car, saying “Hey, Bull.” Given that there is no evidence that Walz was aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6715 - 2005-03-31
and approached the patrol car, saying “Hey, Bull.” Given that there is no evidence that Walz was aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6715 - 2005-03-31
Lillian McKee v. Price County
, 138 N.W.2d at 138. "To say that he was required to stop before plowing each drift on the busy state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12391 - 2005-03-31
, 138 N.W.2d at 138. "To say that he was required to stop before plowing each drift on the busy state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
nature of the case:—“One hand you’re saying one person does it. On the other hand you’re saying one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
nature of the case:—“One hand you’re saying one person does it. On the other hand you’re saying one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert L. Albert
the truth. JUROR TISCHER: I had not made up my mind. [ALBERT’S LAWYER]: I didn’t say you had made up your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4075 - 2005-03-31
the truth. JUROR TISCHER: I had not made up my mind. [ALBERT’S LAWYER]: I didn’t say you had made up your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4075 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence constituted an erroneous exercise of discretion. First, he says that the pre-trial ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932573 - 2025-03-26
evidence constituted an erroneous exercise of discretion. First, he says that the pre-trial ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932573 - 2025-03-26
Patrick Hart v. Meadows Apartments
was premature to say the least. Meadows now claims that its objection was timely because the small claims court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20050 - 2005-10-25
was premature to say the least. Meadows now claims that its objection was timely because the small claims court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20050 - 2005-10-25
[PDF]
State v. Daniel P. Hart
we come back into court to say they conceded?” After some discussion with and another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3980 - 2017-09-20
we come back into court to say they conceded?” After some discussion with and another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3980 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
could hurt Smith in subsequent proceedings. Trial counsel went on to say he and Smith agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205042 - 2017-12-19
could hurt Smith in subsequent proceedings. Trial counsel went on to say he and Smith agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205042 - 2017-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
says that evidence of blood alcohol level “is admissible … if” the three-hour requirement is met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79851 - 2014-09-15
says that evidence of blood alcohol level “is admissible … if” the three-hour requirement is met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79851 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James E. Robinson
that the court excuse Hinton because “she says she doesn’t want to make a decision.” The following exchange
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15425 - 2017-09-21
that the court excuse Hinton because “she says she doesn’t want to make a decision.” The following exchange
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15425 - 2017-09-21