Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44121 - 44130 of 69007 for had.
Search results 44121 - 44130 of 69007 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Russell H. Farr
at sentencing. Again, the discrepancy had no prejudicial effect on Farr and we disregard it as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8000 - 2017-09-19
at sentencing. Again, the discrepancy had no prejudicial effect on Farr and we disregard it as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8000 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
previously granted LaPere’s requests to apply the $1,150 to court costs after LaPere had been informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62135 - 2011-04-04
previously granted LaPere’s requests to apply the $1,150 to court costs after LaPere had been informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62135 - 2011-04-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for not telling her parents that she had friends over at the house. The victim reported the text exchange
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627435 - 2023-03-01
for not telling her parents that she had friends over at the house. The victim reported the text exchange
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627435 - 2023-03-01
State v. Andre Crockett
is distinguishable. In that case, "the evidence [had] no relevance to the issues being decided" in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9645 - 2005-03-31
is distinguishable. In that case, "the evidence [had] no relevance to the issues being decided" in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9645 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Burrows
of prostitution therein.” Burrows believes that this excerpt had the effect in the jury’s eyes of having sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15627 - 2017-09-21
of prostitution therein.” Burrows believes that this excerpt had the effect in the jury’s eyes of having sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Bower
does not dispute that he had a prior serious child sexual assault conviction. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5847 - 2017-09-19
does not dispute that he had a prior serious child sexual assault conviction. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5847 - 2017-09-19
State v. Andre Crockett
is distinguishable. In that case, "the evidence [had] no relevance to the issues being decided" in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9870 - 2005-03-31
is distinguishable. In that case, "the evidence [had] no relevance to the issues being decided" in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for breach of contract. According to Olsen, he and Flagstad had entered into an oral contract in February
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122595 - 2014-10-01
for breach of contract. According to Olsen, he and Flagstad had entered into an oral contract in February
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122595 - 2014-10-01
State v. Robert Wilson
to Wisconsin, pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, he had been convicted in California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12920 - 2005-03-31
to Wisconsin, pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, he had been convicted in California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12920 - 2005-03-31
State v. Byron D. Mitchell
concerns and noted that appellate counsel had forwarded copies of the trial transcripts to him on September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11396 - 2005-03-31
concerns and noted that appellate counsel had forwarded copies of the trial transcripts to him on September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11396 - 2005-03-31