Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44131 - 44140 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 44131 - 44140 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
multiplicitous; trial counsel (“[a]nd [p]ossibly [a]ppellate [c]ounsel”) was ineffective “for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327506 - 2021-01-26
multiplicitous; trial counsel (“[a]nd [p]ossibly [a]ppellate [c]ounsel”) was ineffective “for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327506 - 2021-01-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, trial counsel told the circuit court that the State was investigating additional charges and had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714983 - 2023-10-18
, trial counsel told the circuit court that the State was investigating additional charges and had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714983 - 2023-10-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, challenging his convictions and seeking a new trial. The circuit court denied the motion, and this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45442 - 2010-01-11
, challenging his convictions and seeking a new trial. The circuit court denied the motion, and this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45442 - 2010-01-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there is no meritorious claim that trial counsel’s failure to litigate them constituted ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218749 - 2018-09-12
, there is no meritorious claim that trial counsel’s failure to litigate them constituted ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218749 - 2018-09-12
State v. Gary A. Eloranta
with knowingly obstructing an officer, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1). The State argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5212 - 2005-03-31
with knowingly obstructing an officer, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1). The State argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5212 - 2005-03-31
Security State Bank v. Dale J. Sechen
to confirm a foreclosure sale rests with the discretion of the trial court. Gumz v. Chickering, 19 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19919 - 2005-12-11
to confirm a foreclosure sale rests with the discretion of the trial court. Gumz v. Chickering, 19 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19919 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reflects that Oliver’s trial counsel filed a pretrial motion to suppress Oliver’s statements to law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206755 - 2018-01-05
reflects that Oliver’s trial counsel filed a pretrial motion to suppress Oliver’s statements to law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206755 - 2018-01-05
State v. Mark A. Sturm
suspicion. “A trial court’s determination of whether undisputed facts establish reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
suspicion. “A trial court’s determination of whether undisputed facts establish reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court,” and “portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66225 - 2014-09-15
of the trial court,” and “portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66225 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
who was born in March 2011. The parties were divorced in 2013 following a contested court trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247965 - 2019-10-09
who was born in March 2011. The parties were divorced in 2013 following a contested court trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247965 - 2019-10-09