Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44141 - 44150 of 64562 for b's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the length of this delay in the discussion that follows. No. 2022AP1657-CR 4 B. Reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843804 - 2024-09-04

COURT OF APPEALS
sex with a fifteen-year-old girl on the day of his arrest. When asked why not, King testified, “[b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43452 - 2009-12-06

[PDF] WI APP 33
in § 48.981(1)(am) and referred the abuse allegations (per §§ 48.02(1)(b)-(f) and 48.981(3)(a)3.) to law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162484 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, we reverse and remand on this issue. B. Sholar’s Remaining Claims ¶34 Sholar makes three other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143716 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 50
In section B, we address the County’s alternative argument that it complied with WIS. STAT. § 63.14(3). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62110 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 123
“implicit” in the prosecutor’s letter. B. Wisconsin Case Law. ¶8 We have found five published Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101433 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at trial, she could be impeached with questioning related to the alleged Waukesha County offense. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798404 - 2024-05-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to address that other evidence. B. Annotated Invoices ¶23 Fong points to certain annotated documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173265 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, 331 Wis. 2d 568, ¶20. B. Admissibility of the evidence in this case. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83178 - 2012-05-29

Jane Nielsen v. Terese A. Spencer
the ability to control his [or her] child, and (b) knows or should know of the necessity and opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19236 - 2005-09-19