Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44141 - 44150 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 44141 - 44150 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Converse
based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. ¶5 The client's appellate brief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16789 - 2005-03-31
based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. ¶5 The client's appellate brief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16789 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pamela T.
, Allen K. and Nicole K. She claims: (1) the circuit court lost jurisdiction over the case when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13504 - 2014-07-23
, Allen K. and Nicole K. She claims: (1) the circuit court lost jurisdiction over the case when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13504 - 2014-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id., ¶14. ¶6 Capetillo first claims that the information provided by the citizen informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-03-07
. Id., ¶14. ¶6 Capetillo first claims that the information provided by the citizen informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-03-07
County of Fond du Lac v. Jay D. Graff
upon his claim that his arrest was without probable cause. We uphold the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19211 - 2005-07-31
upon his claim that his arrest was without probable cause. We uphold the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19211 - 2005-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
of trial counsel. To substantiate a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29511 - 2007-06-27
of trial counsel. To substantiate a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29511 - 2007-06-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949285 - 2025-05-07
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949285 - 2025-05-07
State v. L.C. Whitehead, Jr.
his plea withdrawal motion.[1] The issue is whether Whitehead has alleged a prima facie claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26264 - 2006-08-21
his plea withdrawal motion.[1] The issue is whether Whitehead has alleged a prima facie claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26264 - 2006-08-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
exercised its sentencing discretion. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94784 - 2014-09-15
exercised its sentencing discretion. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94784 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139106 - 2015-04-07
and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139106 - 2015-04-07
Rufus West v. Gary McCaughtry
are disregarded. Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.87. The record does not support West’s claim that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10944 - 2005-03-31
are disregarded. Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.87. The record does not support West’s claim that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10944 - 2005-03-31