Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44181 - 44190 of 64735 for b's.

COURT OF APPEALS
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697 (requiring defendant to show both deficiency and resulting prejudice). b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90378 - 2012-12-10

COURT OF APPEALS
as a party to a crime, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.32(1)(b) & (2) and 939.05 (2005-06).[1] He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35383 - 2009-02-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” to understand what was happening, he responded he could “mostly” just hear “[b]its and pieces[.]” ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708375 - 2023-10-04

2007 WI APP 16
on the brief of James B. Connell of Crooks, Low & Connell, S.C., Wausau. 2007 WI App 16 COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27409 - 2007-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS
. Donald G. Jensen, Jr. d/b/a/ Equity Management Services and Equity Management Services, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34914 - 2008-12-17

State v. Daniel R. F.
. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Wisconsin Stat. § 971.01(1) reads: The district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3235 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
by a conveyance that satisfies all of the following: (a) Identifies the parties; and (b) Identifies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27594 - 2014-09-15

State v. Pha Vue
Amendment right to remain silent. B. Right to Counsel ¶17 Next, Vue argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3491 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. “Contempt of court” includes the intentional “[d]isobedience” of a court order. WIS. STAT. § 785.01(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338291 - 2021-02-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo. Hajicek, 240 Wis. 2d. 349, ¶15. B. Analysis. ¶22 We begin with Thomas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216144 - 2018-07-26