Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4421 - 4430 of 15237 for 2013.
Search results 4421 - 4430 of 15237 for 2013.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2013-14). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138435 - 2017-09-21
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2013-14). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138435 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. Rule 809.83(2) (2013-14).[1] Webster did not respond to our order. On November 21, 2014, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137501 - 2015-03-16
. Stat. Rule 809.83(2) (2013-14).[1] Webster did not respond to our order. On November 21, 2014, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137501 - 2015-03-16
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137016 - 2015-03-05
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137016 - 2015-03-05
CA Blank Order
. Stat. §§ 940.09(1)(b), 940.25(1)(b) (2013-14).[1] Attorney Thomas Voss has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141761 - 2015-05-11
. Stat. §§ 940.09(1)(b), 940.25(1)(b) (2013-14).[1] Attorney Thomas Voss has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141761 - 2015-05-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146880 - 2017-09-21
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146880 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1 concluding no grounds exist to challenge Pingel’s conviction for second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145008 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1 concluding no grounds exist to challenge Pingel’s conviction for second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145008 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175701 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175701 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the circuit court’s determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181940 - 2017-09-21
for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the circuit court’s determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181940 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. The accident occurred when Botdorf was travelling northbound
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157263 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. The accident occurred when Botdorf was travelling northbound
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157263 - 2017-09-21