Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4421 - 4430 of 50586 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.
Search results 4421 - 4430 of 50586 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.
State v. Howard D. Platt
because: (1) the officer did not articulate a reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle, (2) the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13232 - 2005-03-31
because: (1) the officer did not articulate a reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle, (2) the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13232 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony W. Quattrochi
.[1] On appeal, Quattrochi argues that: (1) the officer did not have probable cause to arrest; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
.[1] On appeal, Quattrochi argues that: (1) the officer did not have probable cause to arrest; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Tilley, an officer with the Beloit police department and supervisor of the gang and drug unit, testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
Tilley, an officer with the Beloit police department and supervisor of the gang and drug unit, testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
City of New Berlin v. Jeffery D. Eggum
that the police officer had sufficient reasonable suspicion to execute a traffic stop, probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14059 - 2005-03-31
that the police officer had sufficient reasonable suspicion to execute a traffic stop, probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14059 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. Sherman C. Sporle
post-arrest tests for alcohol concentration. Specifically, Sporle argues that the arresting officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31
post-arrest tests for alcohol concentration. Specifically, Sporle argues that the arresting officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher L. Ambort
and a meaningful opportunity to be heard, because (1) the arresting officer did not issue a Notice of Intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
and a meaningful opportunity to be heard, because (1) the arresting officer did not issue a Notice of Intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
for obstructing an officer, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 946.41(1). Peters first contends that the circuit erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32802 - 2014-09-15
for obstructing an officer, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 946.41(1). Peters first contends that the circuit erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32802 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
] Michael D. Peters appeals from a judgment of conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2015-02-02
] Michael D. Peters appeals from a judgment of conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32802 - 2015-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 24, 2004, Lemke (while off-duty) attended a party held at Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30924 - 2007-11-19
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 24, 2004, Lemke (while off-duty) attended a party held at Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30924 - 2007-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., and a passenger, G.J.3 After Officer Jordan Kunya and Officer Luis Madrigal arrived on the scene, A.L. and G.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969905 - 2025-06-17
., and a passenger, G.J.3 After Officer Jordan Kunya and Officer Luis Madrigal arrived on the scene, A.L. and G.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969905 - 2025-06-17