Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4421 - 4430 of 72987 for we.

State v. Alexander E. Grossmann
that his constitutional right to present a defense was adversely affected. We reject Grossmann’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11064 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
failed to consider the relevant sentencing factors. For the reasons discussed below, we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613734 - 2023-01-24

[PDF] Diane Newby v. Manufactured Housing Enterprises, Inc.
determination that an award of actual attorney fees would be inappropriate, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6536 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Horace Mann Insurance Company
, was a named defendant. The trial court declined to do so. Because we determine that Bailey’s conduct did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19421 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 75
Complete Title of Case: WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY D/B/A WE ENERGIES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32342 - 2014-09-15

Halquist Stone Company, Inc. v. Town of Brothertown Planning and Zoning Committee
not reasonably deny the permit. We conclude that the committee’s findings lack specificity, and therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12029 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 144
. We conclude the circuit court properly awarded costs to the Estate pursuant to § 814.01(1) because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72535 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Alexander E. Grossmann
a No. 96-1914-CR -2- defense was adversely affected. We reject Grossmann’s argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11064 - 2017-09-19

Certification
Higginbotham, P.J., Vergeront and Bridge, JJ. We certify this appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court under Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37030 - 2015-03-22

[PDF] Halquist Stone Company, Inc. v. Town of Brothertown Planning and Zoning Committee
not reasonably deny the permit. We conclude that the committee’s findings lack specificity, and therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12029 - 2017-09-21