Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44211 - 44220 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
Search results 44211 - 44220 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
directly address the circuit court’s decision to dismiss his case for failure to state a claim. While we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102464 - 2017-09-21
directly address the circuit court’s decision to dismiss his case for failure to state a claim. While we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102464 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the charge in this case. Pride demanded a jury trial. ¶4 At trial, Officer Osell testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2008-09-02
to the charge in this case. Pride demanded a jury trial. ¶4 At trial, Officer Osell testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791677 - 2024-04-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791677 - 2024-04-24
Frontsheet
2008 WI 120 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2007AP2546-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34283 - 2008-10-13
2008 WI 120 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2007AP2546-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34283 - 2008-10-13
State v. Douglas T. Meyer
the cases from two counties; (2) the repeater allegations were not properly pled or proved and Meyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3811 - 2005-03-31
the cases from two counties; (2) the repeater allegations were not properly pled or proved and Meyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3811 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
information. Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand the case for resentencing. ¶2 An original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26929 - 2006-10-30
information. Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand the case for resentencing. ¶2 An original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26929 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804071 - 2024-05-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804071 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Saich
that “a decision in Thorstad will likely resolve any issue in this case.” 5 The Bohling requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2380 - 2017-09-19
that “a decision in Thorstad will likely resolve any issue in this case.” 5 The Bohling requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2380 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rudolph Konlock v. Anthony DePietro
omitted). ¶7 The known and compelling danger exception is determined on a case-by-case basis. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6787 - 2017-09-20
omitted). ¶7 The known and compelling danger exception is determined on a case-by-case basis. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6787 - 2017-09-20