Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44241 - 44250 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 44241 - 44250 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
in the case.” Id. at 471. When the circuit court sets forth the reasons for its decision under sec. 801.15(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32175 - 2008-03-25
in the case.” Id. at 471. When the circuit court sets forth the reasons for its decision under sec. 801.15(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32175 - 2008-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. T.W. argued that “this was an extremely close case,” as two jurors dissented on the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217987 - 2018-08-21
. T.W. argued that “this was an extremely close case,” as two jurors dissented on the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217987 - 2018-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to appeal by entering a plea. Because the State agrees, we address Kolstad’s case on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30353 - 2014-09-15
to appeal by entering a plea. Because the State agrees, we address Kolstad’s case on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Brown, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this collection case, Leasing Services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110892 - 2017-09-21
. Before Brown, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this collection case, Leasing Services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110892 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and a stipulation he entered in the related operating-while-intoxicated case does not preclude relief. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
, and a stipulation he entered in the related operating-while-intoxicated case does not preclude relief. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
County of Sauk v. Jammie M. Douglas
. The second sample was stored in a cooler, but was eventually destroyed. Douglas argues that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6274 - 2017-09-19
. The second sample was stored in a cooler, but was eventually destroyed. Douglas argues that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6274 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Julie D. v. Derek P.
of the juvenile court. See § 48.14(10), STATS. Thus, appointment of a GAL in such cases is governed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14238 - 2014-09-15
of the juvenile court. See § 48.14(10), STATS. Thus, appointment of a GAL in such cases is governed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14238 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy J. Powers
of the court’s opinion. The only prior reference to the “circumstances” of the case occurs in the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15578 - 2005-03-31
of the court’s opinion. The only prior reference to the “circumstances” of the case occurs in the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15578 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry Anderson
cases. At a hearing on Anderson’s motion, the State agreed that buy money may not be ordered reimbursed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3843 - 2005-03-31
cases. At a hearing on Anderson’s motion, the State agreed that buy money may not be ordered reimbursed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3843 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
case law interpreting that case. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134925 - 2015-02-11
case law interpreting that case. Accordingly, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134925 - 2015-02-11