Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44241 - 44250 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 44241 - 44250 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051789 - 2025-12-23
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051789 - 2025-12-23
State v. Jesse R.J.
, the court lost its competency to dispose of the petition. We conclude that the record shows the requisite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
, the court lost its competency to dispose of the petition. We conclude that the record shows the requisite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214314 - 2018-06-13
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214314 - 2018-06-13
CA Blank Order
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136720 - 2015-03-10
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136720 - 2015-03-10
State v. Dwan L. Schuck
are not persuaded. Schuck’s argument rests entirely on her assertion that the Intoxilyzer test record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13876 - 2005-03-31
are not persuaded. Schuck’s argument rests entirely on her assertion that the Intoxilyzer test record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and a subsequent petition for a writ of error. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07
and a subsequent petition for a writ of error. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Jesse R.J.
2 conclude that the record shows the requisite “good cause” for a court to grant a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12283 - 2017-09-21
2 conclude that the record shows the requisite “good cause” for a court to grant a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12283 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason A. Krysheski
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11918 - 2017-09-21
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11918 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Gerow. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357581 - 2021-04-20
Gerow. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357581 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251689 - 2019-12-26
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251689 - 2019-12-26