Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44241 - 44250 of 58510 for speedy trial.

State v. Steven C.
argument to the trial court, the court granted the DOC’s request, finding the need to protect the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5049 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
conviction and the order denying his suppression motion and for a new trial with the evidence suppressed were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135116 - 2015-02-17

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant had to either enter a plea or go to trial, taking into account factors such as the importance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27

[PDF] Kenneth Gable v. Sheriff James Kanikula
of these questions raises a question of law which this court determines without deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11390 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Carlos A. Merino
intoxicated, second offense. He now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 When reviewing a trial court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6261 - 2017-09-19

Shirley A. Pratsch v. Robert M. Pratsch
of the trial court." Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. v. International Rectifier Corp., 91 Wis.2d 813, 822, 284 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10312 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
deference to the trial court's determination. State v. Keith, 175 Wis.2d 75, 78, 498 N.W.2d 865, 866 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10489 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. At a bench trial, a deputy sheriff testified to the following. The deputy conducted a traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064490 - 2026-01-23

Kenneth Gable v. Sheriff James Kanikula
which this court determines without deference to the trial court's determination. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11390 - 2005-03-31

Accu-Tech Plastics, Inc. v. Midwest Microform Industries, Inc.
a default judgment. It argues the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it entered judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5508 - 2005-03-31