Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44251 - 44260 of 84318 for case number.
Search results 44251 - 44260 of 84318 for case number.
Firstar Trust Company v. Richard D. Gebhardt
of collateral as a matter of law. Because the law of the case holds that the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13072 - 2005-03-31
of collateral as a matter of law. Because the law of the case holds that the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13072 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
cases all testified that there was no agreement between Conner and the State when Conner testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
cases all testified that there was no agreement between Conner and the State when Conner testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Saturnino R. Guerra-Reyna
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7748 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7748 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome of the trial. This case came down to whether the jury believed that Jones engaged in sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118321 - 2014-09-15
in the outcome of the trial. This case came down to whether the jury believed that Jones engaged in sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118321 - 2014-09-15
Anthony Pratt v. Green Bay Correctional Institution
, and the costs of litigating the action. The court commissioner ultimately dismissed Pratt’s case for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6503 - 2005-03-31
, and the costs of litigating the action. The court commissioner ultimately dismissed Pratt’s case for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6503 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
informed the court they had settled the case and the following exchange occurred: THE COURT: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148940 - 2017-09-21
informed the court they had settled the case and the following exchange occurred: THE COURT: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148940 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of both incidents. In this case, based on these allegations, the State charged Hardaway with two counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
of both incidents. In this case, based on these allegations, the State charged Hardaway with two counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The case was ultimately resolved with a plea agreement. In exchange for Glosson’s guilty plea, the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226347 - 2018-11-01
. The case was ultimately resolved with a plea agreement. In exchange for Glosson’s guilty plea, the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226347 - 2018-11-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Given the unique facts of this case, claim preclusion does not apply as there is no identity between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212288 - 2018-05-09
. Given the unique facts of this case, claim preclusion does not apply as there is no identity between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212288 - 2018-05-09
[PDF]
James Munroe v. Patrick D. Braatz
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9679 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9679 - 2017-09-19