Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44251 - 44260 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the unrelated cases. A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel has two parts: (1) deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124592 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Lawrence J. Gegare
because he claimed they were the products of an unlawful seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13563 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
amount in purported settlement of the subrogor's claim without the subrogor having agreed to accept
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17562 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kevin McCraney
of counsel. To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12134 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Christine Connors v. Robert Reimer
not reflect confusion on Christine’s part due to that condition. Christine’s claims that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13791 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Darrell J. Shearer
. § 343.305. He claims the trial court erred in concluding that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3739 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Steven R. Passehl v. Jay Zeinert
with the Lacy/Pella property, but claimed that Passehl had been fully paid. Passehl testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7603 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
basis for granting a new trial in the interest of justice. His argument is based on his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57556 - 2010-12-06

State v. Christopher M. Clutter
a judgment based on a claim that the real controversy has not been fully tried, is not specifically required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15261 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying postconviction relief. Duke claims he is entitled to a new trial because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09