Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44261 - 44270 of 73365 for ha.

State v. George H. Tutor
739 (1979). In addition, when a motion to withdraw a plea is made after sentencing, the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3677 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Portage County Department of Human Services v. Rebecca E.
is unequivocal: A parent has the right to representation in court unless there is a waiver; and, in any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3387 - 2017-09-19

State v. Pamela A. Schmidt
. The plain language of § 946.47(1)(a) and (2)(a), Stats. suggests no distinction between a person who has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13193 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brent L. Barber
is whether the trial court erred in its evidentiary rulings during Barber’s trial. A trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11581 - 2017-09-19

State v. Randall W. Edwards
court has expansively applied rule 908.03(2), Stats., in child sexual assault cases. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11393 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Terrence Miller
the meaning of the Fourth Amendment and are constitutionally permissible if the officer has a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14785 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Waupun, WI 53963-0700 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877041 - 2024-11-19

State v. Dennis L. Steele
, 286 N.W.2d at 560. The rationale is that the trial court has the advantage in considering all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13267 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard E. Davis
that the investigation has not yet been completed, a suspect does not have the right to terminate it. State v. Goyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14557 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
of establishing a prima facie case of disparate treatment is not onerous,’ plaintiff has not met that burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14585 - 2017-09-21