Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44261 - 44270 of 64233 for records/1000.

David M. Iushewitz v. Milwaukee County PersonnelReview Board
is unreasonable under the facts as established in the record.” We reject the Board's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8541 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of discretion occurs when the circuit court does not consider the facts of record under the relevant law or does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29

State v. Michael B. Vernio
of the record indicates the trial court did not rely on this information. Therefore, the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7141 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” No. 01-2977 01-2078 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Andrew S. Miller
to a speedy trial by affirmatively stating on the record that he was not requesting a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5097 - 2017-09-19

Margaret Smith v. Richard Golde
explained the reasons for its determination of damages. It found abundant evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3384 - 2005-03-31

Waukesha County v. Ty L.
good cause to the contrary is shown, the court may admit testimony on the record by telephone or live
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13389 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Randall G. Bobholz v. John Banaszak
the relevant facts of record, applied the correct legal standard and reached a conclusion that a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5235 - 2017-09-19

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
and misleading evidence to the OLR's investigators. Finally, there is nothing in the record that suggests
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16803 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jon Wirth v. City of Port Washington
lot. b. By recorded private claim. c. By quarter section, section, township and range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3671 - 2017-09-19