Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44271 - 44280 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 44271 - 44280 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
County of Rusk v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0298-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13582 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0298-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(Ct. App. 1994). ¶13 Examining Welnicke’s actions in this case, we are satisfied that they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93392 - 2014-09-15
(Ct. App. 1994). ¶13 Examining Welnicke’s actions in this case, we are satisfied that they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93392 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
694. When a case hinges on witness credibility, trial counsel has a duty to investigate and present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32629 - 2008-05-05
694. When a case hinges on witness credibility, trial counsel has a duty to investigate and present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32629 - 2008-05-05
Terri A. Birt v. Anne Marie Bonkowski
J. Majeski. We conclude that this case is controlled by the doctrine of judicial estoppel. Hence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5345 - 2005-03-31
J. Majeski. We conclude that this case is controlled by the doctrine of judicial estoppel. Hence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5345 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy L. Walker
.2d 810 (1980). As in the Northridge case: “The defect in this case is not one of jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15266 - 2005-03-31
.2d 810 (1980). As in the Northridge case: “The defect in this case is not one of jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15266 - 2005-03-31
State v. Julie A. Williams
. State, 76 Wis. 2d 457, 469, 251 N.W.2d 461 (1977). ¶6 The constitutional question in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5625 - 2005-03-31
. State, 76 Wis. 2d 457, 469, 251 N.W.2d 461 (1977). ¶6 The constitutional question in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5625 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas T. Meyer
the cases from two counties; (2) the repeater allegations were not properly pled or proved and Meyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3810 - 2005-03-31
the cases from two counties; (2) the repeater allegations were not properly pled or proved and Meyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3810 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
be the case. The first is “when the arrestee is unsecured and within reaching distance of the passenger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48859 - 2014-09-15
be the case. The first is “when the arrestee is unsecured and within reaching distance of the passenger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48859 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
). Although the parties differ as to the appropriate level of deference in this case, we conclude that great
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91323 - 2013-01-08
). Although the parties differ as to the appropriate level of deference in this case, we conclude that great
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91323 - 2013-01-08
[PDF]
Douglas County Department of Human Services v. Susan L.
with the written notification requirement. This case involves a question of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12882 - 2017-09-21
with the written notification requirement. This case involves a question of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12882 - 2017-09-21