Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44271 - 44280 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 44271 - 44280 of 65039 for timed.
State v. John L. Dye, Jr.
the time Dye kidnapped and assaulted her. Dye raised this issue shortly before T.P. took the stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5897 - 2005-03-31
the time Dye kidnapped and assaulted her. Dye raised this issue shortly before T.P. took the stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5897 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
trial, finding that his defense counsel had not preserved his challenge by timely objection, and that Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27166 - 2006-11-15
trial, finding that his defense counsel had not preserved his challenge by timely objection, and that Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27166 - 2006-11-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
expressly limited to the time between issuance of the order and the examination date. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216470 - 2018-07-31
expressly limited to the time between issuance of the order and the examination date. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216470 - 2018-07-31
State v. Debra Kerkman
. Kerkman and Tracy both testified that at the time Kerkman made the statements she was upset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8818 - 2005-03-31
. Kerkman and Tracy both testified that at the time Kerkman made the statements she was upset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8818 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Thornton, Jr.
with a dangerous weapon” penalty enhancer for the first time, based on the Peete and Howard decisions. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3997 - 2005-03-31
with a dangerous weapon” penalty enhancer for the first time, based on the Peete and Howard decisions. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3997 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth W. Raush
incorporated by reference into the complaint were valid at the time of his alleged convictions in those two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10787 - 2017-09-20
incorporated by reference into the complaint were valid at the time of his alleged convictions in those two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10787 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Eric L. King
omitted). 2 ¶10 A Terry stop must at all times be temporary and last no longer than necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26361 - 2017-09-21
omitted). 2 ¶10 A Terry stop must at all times be temporary and last no longer than necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
many times over.” The court held the motion was untimely as it should have been raised on direct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239161 - 2019-04-16
many times over.” The court held the motion was untimely as it should have been raised on direct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239161 - 2019-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had been issued five months prior and Peplinski had ample time to retain legal counsel. I conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242480 - 2019-06-20
had been issued five months prior and Peplinski had ample time to retain legal counsel. I conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242480 - 2019-06-20
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
and a motion to withdraw as counsel. In his motion for plea withdrawal, O’Kray alleged that “[a]t the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
and a motion to withdraw as counsel. In his motion for plea withdrawal, O’Kray alleged that “[a]t the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31