Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44281 - 44290 of 83861 for case number.
Search results 44281 - 44290 of 83861 for case number.
[PDF]
NOTICE
have raised on direct appeal. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 In Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
have raised on direct appeal. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 In Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kris A. Westberg
(citations omitted).[2] Because the procedural history of this case and the evidentiary history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7525 - 2005-03-31
(citations omitted).[2] Because the procedural history of this case and the evidentiary history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7525 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dexter Tolefree
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. These appeals arise from six cases which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11308 - 2017-09-19
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. These appeals arise from six cases which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11308 - 2017-09-19
State v. David Entis Rees
the judgment. Background ¶2 The facts in this case are undisputed. On August 11, 1999, Rees possessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4353 - 2005-03-31
the judgment. Background ¶2 The facts in this case are undisputed. On August 11, 1999, Rees possessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4353 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas G. Skenandore
and sentenced him accordingly. ¶6 The facts in this case are undisputed; however, as the State points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4410 - 2005-03-31
and sentenced him accordingly. ¶6 The facts in this case are undisputed; however, as the State points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4410 - 2005-03-31
Donald Dei v. Byron Dei
. Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 BROWN, J. This case involves a challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6547 - 2005-03-31
. Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 BROWN, J. This case involves a challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142467 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Don Kemp v. Stephen Wolff
the dismissal of his small claims case against his former employer, identified by the small-claims summons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5503 - 2017-09-19
the dismissal of his small claims case against his former employer, identified by the small-claims summons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5503 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Statutes require the State to prove the case for an initial commitment beyond a reasonable doubt. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93170 - 2013-02-20
Statutes require the State to prove the case for an initial commitment beyond a reasonable doubt. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93170 - 2013-02-20