Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4431 - 4440 of 63485 for records.
Search results 4431 - 4440 of 63485 for records.
Todd M. Spoehr v. Regina R. Woroniecki
, that the amount of attorney fees awarded was unreasonable. We conclude the record supports the court’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6026 - 2005-03-31
, that the amount of attorney fees awarded was unreasonable. We conclude the record supports the court’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6026 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
appellate attorney and error by this court in our review of the record during the no-merit process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30255 - 2007-09-17
appellate attorney and error by this court in our review of the record during the no-merit process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30255 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and video recordings. One search warrant was for the premises located at 14265 County Road F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237840 - 2019-03-21
and video recordings. One search warrant was for the premises located at 14265 County Road F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237840 - 2019-03-21
[PDF]
Randall J. Wilson v. The Estate of Elsie L. Woodford
theory of strict responsibility misrepresentation; and (3) determined damages. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10313 - 2017-09-20
theory of strict responsibility misrepresentation; and (3) determined damages. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10313 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551893 - 2022-08-09
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551893 - 2022-08-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because Dumesic’s questioning of him was not recorded. Mendez also contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74020 - 2014-09-15
because Dumesic’s questioning of him was not recorded. Mendez also contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74020 - 2014-09-15
State v. Irvon L. Crawford
. Crawford contends that the destruction of the tape recording of the victim’s 911 call was a violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12647 - 2005-03-31
. Crawford contends that the destruction of the tape recording of the victim’s 911 call was a violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12647 - 2005-03-31
Ray A. Peterson v. Teresa E. Tucker
. We conclude that the record, such as it is, supports the trial court’s conclusion. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15113 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that the record, such as it is, supports the trial court’s conclusion. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon false information. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110282 - 2017-09-21
upon false information. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110282 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and the response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241926 - 2019-06-07
of the report and the response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241926 - 2019-06-07