Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44301 - 44310 of 68502 for did.

Danny R. Hertrampf v. Jerome M. Ott
." The court set damages at $100,000. The court did not compensate the Hertrampfs for lost compensatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8286 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Pamela Mona Imme v. Bruce Wayne Imme
. While Bruce established that the children actually spent more than 50% of their time with him, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15569 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 30, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
, but ultimately determined that Jill did not meet her burden of proving that the dog was given to her. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100066 - 2013-07-29

[PDF] State v. Jesse E. Voss
of his refusal by letter mailed on July 5, 1995. For some unknown reason, the clerk did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9737 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David G. Grimm
to argue before this court, as he did before the trial court, that he was simply getting his wallet from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9124 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
mortality risk, nothing in that evidence indicates that the same diagnosis and mortality risk did not exist
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119163 - 2014-08-06

COURT OF APPEALS
of intent to pursue postconviction relief following his sentencing in June 1994, but he did not pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22

State v. Wesley H., Sr.
. Although Wesley H. did not object to this testimony at the time, he later, as noted, asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6465 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brandon K. Dittberner
Dittberner’s sentence modification motion because he did not demonstrate the existence of a new factor. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13219 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
did not file a respondent’s brief. We conclude that summary reversal as a sanction for the failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113092 - 2014-05-22