Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44321 - 44330 of 61985 for child support.

Mary E. Fazio v. Department of Employee Trust Funds
(8), the statute that defines "beneficiary" for the purpose of ch. 40, supports the argument that she
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21081 - 2006-01-25

State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
asserting that there was an outstanding warrant at the time the court finds does not support any finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
legal authority to support the proposition that it is somehow unfair to require him to fully address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365934 - 2021-05-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. I. Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84346 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
favorable to him.3 He contends the reports support an alternate suspect/third-party defense, point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234713 - 2019-02-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
detain a person for investigative purposes if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258474 - 2020-04-28

[PDF] NOTICE
for the proposition that a citizen witness’s tip is not enough to support an investigative stop and that a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62279 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 2, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
supports a finding that the Housing Authority would be liable to Coleman for the wrongful holdover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98725 - 2013-07-01

[PDF] NOTICE
. § 939.46(1) (2005-06).2 Here, there was no evidence to support a conclusion that Napier faced imminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34377 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
viable, fact-supported legal theories on the appellant’s behalf. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 646
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538913 - 2022-06-29