Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44341 - 44350 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 44341 - 44350 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
was sentenced based on inaccurate information. Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26929 - 2014-09-15
was sentenced based on inaccurate information. Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26929 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark S. Witkowski
, immobilization and other provisions of the statutes. This case presents an undisputed set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
, immobilization and other provisions of the statutes. This case presents an undisputed set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209259 - 2018-03-07
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209259 - 2018-03-07
State v. William Backhaus
. In the instant case, there is overwhelming evidence to support the conviction. We have previously detailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9356 - 2005-03-31
. In the instant case, there is overwhelming evidence to support the conviction. We have previously detailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9356 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rodney R. Clark
2000 WI App 245 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 245 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 3 In this case, the circuit court did not instruct the jury regarding the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340785 - 2021-02-24
-CRNM 3 In this case, the circuit court did not instruct the jury regarding the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340785 - 2021-02-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193800 - 2017-09-21
a supplemental no-merit report. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William Backhaus
not been challenged, we believe it is critical that we comment briefly on the three cases Backhaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9356 - 2017-09-19
not been challenged, we believe it is critical that we comment briefly on the three cases Backhaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9356 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convictions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192378 - 2017-09-21
convictions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192378 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason D. Schultz
a recommendation of Intensive Sanctions sentence in this case anyway. So I don't see that we gain anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8666 - 2017-09-19
a recommendation of Intensive Sanctions sentence in this case anyway. So I don't see that we gain anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8666 - 2017-09-19