Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44351 - 44360 of 68502 for did.
Search results 44351 - 44360 of 68502 for did.
State v. Jovan T. Mull
because he failed to provide a sufficient reason why he did not raise them on his first appeal. See Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6794 - 2005-03-31
because he failed to provide a sufficient reason why he did not raise them on his first appeal. See Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6794 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Schellinger did not rely on the observed weaving to form a belief that Thomas was operating while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83139 - 2012-05-29
Schellinger did not rely on the observed weaving to form a belief that Thomas was operating while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83139 - 2012-05-29
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
. Webster next argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21
. Webster next argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Duke M. Jawara
, and transported for a blood test, which yielded a result of 0.14 g/100 ml. ¶4 Jawara did not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3689 - 2017-09-19
, and transported for a blood test, which yielded a result of 0.14 g/100 ml. ¶4 Jawara did not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3689 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Formerly, § 814.04(2) did not authorize awarding those costs. See WIS. STAT. § 814.04(2) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26924 - 2014-09-15
. Formerly, § 814.04(2) did not authorize awarding those costs. See WIS. STAT. § 814.04(2) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26924 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the juvenile court did examine the relevant facts, applied the appropriate standard and used a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31915 - 2014-09-15
that the juvenile court did examine the relevant facts, applied the appropriate standard and used a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31915 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the State did not meet its burden of proof. The circuit court concluded that Ellis’s claims were barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36480 - 2014-09-15
that the State did not meet its burden of proof. The circuit court concluded that Ellis’s claims were barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36480 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a defendant’s guilty plea. Here, the court did not make an express finding that there was a factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691891 - 2023-08-23
for a defendant’s guilty plea. Here, the court did not make an express finding that there was a factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691891 - 2023-08-23
[PDF]
Monthly Statistical Report - December 2010
. Majority Opinion: Abrahamson, C.J. Dissent: Bradley, J. Crooks, J. did not participate. 12/02/2010
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58632 - 2014-09-15
. Majority Opinion: Abrahamson, C.J. Dissent: Bradley, J. Crooks, J. did not participate. 12/02/2010
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58632 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Monthly Statistical Report - December 2010
. Majority Opinion: Abrahamson, C.J. Dissent: Bradley, J. Crooks, J. did not participate. 12/02/2010
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59639 - 2014-09-15
. Majority Opinion: Abrahamson, C.J. Dissent: Bradley, J. Crooks, J. did not participate. 12/02/2010
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59639 - 2014-09-15