Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44361 - 44370 of 58789 for do.
Search results 44361 - 44370 of 58789 for do.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
property is marital property. See WIS. STAT. §§ 766.01, 766.31(2). These arguments, however, do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84339 - 2014-09-15
property is marital property. See WIS. STAT. §§ 766.01, 766.31(2). These arguments, however, do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84339 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a prima facie case for summary judgment; if they do, we then examine the opponent’s submissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131638 - 2017-09-21
a prima facie case for summary judgment; if they do, we then examine the opponent’s submissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131638 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Marvin D. Doyle
. Penalty enhancers that subject a defendant to additional years of incarceration do not convert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9463 - 2017-09-19
. Penalty enhancers that subject a defendant to additional years of incarceration do not convert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9463 - 2017-09-19
County of Dunn v. Gerald J. Trainor
a horizontal gaze nystagamus test and refused to do any field sobriety tests while commenting, “I did your test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3631 - 2005-03-31
a horizontal gaze nystagamus test and refused to do any field sobriety tests while commenting, “I did your test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3631 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
misunderstanding of the effect of such titling. ¶9 A court in equity can reform written instruments that do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139726 - 2015-04-14
misunderstanding of the effect of such titling. ¶9 A court in equity can reform written instruments that do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139726 - 2015-04-14
State v. Debra A. Sledge
modification. We do not agree. A “new factor” is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14004 - 2005-03-31
modification. We do not agree. A “new factor” is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14004 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 12, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
, but decided not to do so because he did not believe an expert was needed to show that Green was not impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80889 - 2012-04-11
, but decided not to do so because he did not believe an expert was needed to show that Green was not impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80889 - 2012-04-11
David A. Clark v. Gary R. McCaughtry
quiver and cream. Clark wrote a letter back to Beiber responding: All of our girls here are doing just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14507 - 2005-03-31
quiver and cream. Clark wrote a letter back to Beiber responding: All of our girls here are doing just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14507 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph O. Corbisier
, just as judges and juries do at trials. To the extent an officer finds the informant credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21268 - 2006-02-06
, just as judges and juries do at trials. To the extent an officer finds the informant credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21268 - 2006-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
factor is a question of law that this court decides independently. Id., ¶33. If the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87625 - 2012-10-01
factor is a question of law that this court decides independently. Id., ¶33. If the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87625 - 2012-10-01