Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44381 - 44390 of 60453 for two.
Search results 44381 - 44390 of 60453 for two.
[PDF]
State v. Robert John Kotz
regarding the testing of the marijuana. The defense testimony consisted of Kotz's two brothers regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10856 - 2017-09-20
regarding the testing of the marijuana. The defense testimony consisted of Kotz's two brothers regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10856 - 2017-09-20
State v. Charles W. Johnson
consecutive four-year terms, concurrent to sentences imposed in two other counties. Johnson subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
consecutive four-year terms, concurrent to sentences imposed in two other counties. Johnson subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harvey L. Smith
properly quashed the two subpoenas. The subpoenaed trial counsel made only one appearance for Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9574 - 2005-03-31
properly quashed the two subpoenas. The subpoenaed trial counsel made only one appearance for Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9574 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to be awarded, two requirements must be satisfied: “(1) the defendant must have been ‘in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94895 - 2013-04-01
to be awarded, two requirements must be satisfied: “(1) the defendant must have been ‘in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94895 - 2013-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
by stating: “The parties agree that this case presents two issues for review: (1) whether substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
by stating: “The parties agree that this case presents two issues for review: (1) whether substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
Herbert E. Droste v. David H. Schwarz
in substance,” as transactionally related. Here, the DOC notified Droste by letter approximately two months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15671 - 2005-03-31
in substance,” as transactionally related. Here, the DOC notified Droste by letter approximately two months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15671 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, only O’Brien’s claim against The X Bar remained for trial. ¶5 A two-day trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89677 - 2012-11-26
, only O’Brien’s claim against The X Bar remained for trial. ¶5 A two-day trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89677 - 2012-11-26
Robert Pence v. M&I Central State Bank
of a barn and advanced Summit the purchase price of $22,347. Unknown to Pence, Summit had defaulted on two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5086 - 2005-03-31
of a barn and advanced Summit the purchase price of $22,347. Unknown to Pence, Summit had defaulted on two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5086 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and $2,793 in the two cases. He then argued various factors should lead to an upward departure, resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36472 - 2009-05-11
and $2,793 in the two cases. He then argued various factors should lead to an upward departure, resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36472 - 2009-05-11
Victor Salbashian v. David C. Matzke
. PER CURIAM. Victor S. Salbashian appeals from two judgments dismissing his claims against Opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14275 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. Victor S. Salbashian appeals from two judgments dismissing his claims against Opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14275 - 2005-03-31